Home    In The Spotlight    Drawing on Imagination: 'UFO - The Movie' Concept Art
Drawing on Imagination: 'UFO - The Movie' Concept Art 
What might the Gerry Anderson reboot look like? We speculate inside.
By Robert Falconer, Illustrations by Eric Chu | Wednesday, June 10, 2009
  • Home
In late May it was announced that The Robert Evans Co. has a first-look deal at Paramount with respect to the classic Gerry Anderson series UFO (1970). Evans' reputation certainly proceeds him; he brought the classics Chinatown and Marathon Man to the big screen. And while he might seem like an unorthodox choice to resurrect Anderson's first live-action television series into a feature film, he apparently seems to grasp its significance both to fans, and to the UK's ITV Global, the current property holder and Evans' partner in the project. "We know the importance of the UFO series brand to ITV Global, and we will work closely with them to build this into a franchise," Evans said.

Here at CinemaSpy we began to wonder what such a big screen version of UFO would look like. How much of it will adhere to the designs of the original and simply update them? Will it translate to our more sophisticated 21st century sensibility and aesthetic, yet still maintain the fidelity of the original? Or will it be completely re-imagined and throw out what's come before?

And that got us to thinking. Maybe we ought to have some fun and come up with a few designs of our own.

So we turned to Eric Chu. Eric is perhaps best known for his work as a production illustrator on the recent, critically acclaimed series Battlestar Galactica, where he created some of the most recognized designs for the re-imagined property, including the Galactica herself, the new Cylon Centurions, and both the Cylon Raiders and Basestar.

More recently, Eric also lent his artistic skills to the soon-to-be-released book, "The Science of Battlestar Galactica", for which he illustrated the cover.

Chu started his career in the mid-'80s in the animation business as a storyboard artist. A few years later he moved to Asia and co-founded Fisheye Films, where he served as a creative director for television commercials. Upon returning to Canada, he found work in Vancouver BC as an art director.

The battlestar Galactica, designed by Eric Chu.
In 2005 he produced a short film featuring Optimus Prime, which then attracted the interest of Hasbro and Tom DeSanto, one of the producers of the 'Transformers' movies. (To watch the short film, click on the Video tab at the top of this article.)

He remains active in the industry under the banner of his own studio, Paranoid Delusions Inc., and is currently developing an animated feature with one of Asia's largest media networks, while continuing to work on other assorted art projects.

If you missed Eric's toons, which were featured as part of our Battlestar Galactica Tech Blog, you can catch up on those here. Eric is also passionate about the film world in general, with a vast repository of knowledge about it that would put many film-o-philes to shame. He wrote an article for us recently about the potential pitfalls of overhyping 3-D usage in film, despite the alleged technical improvements currently being touted by filmmakers like James Cameron. You can find that article here.

A Cylon Centurion from 'Battlestar Galactica', designed by Eric Chu.But back to UFO. We began to have some conversations about the classic property‚ and how it might look if it actually gets its planned update. That led to some brainstorming, which led to some furious drawing on Eric's part. What emerged were a few select pieces of artwork that give us a little peak into how a "new" UFO might look. You can find them further down the page.

[Note: This will be the first in a series of speculative artwork (entitled Drawing on Imagination) for other beloved properties that are soon to be remade, or otherwise translated to film. For this first in the series, we began by asking Eric a few questions about what goes into his process.]

CinemaSpy: After working on Battlestar Galactica, another classic property with its own particular set of requirements, tell us what you found most challenging about re-imagining Gerry Anderson's material...which predates the original Battlestar Galactica by about eight years?

Eric Chu: As with BSG, the trick is to take what you loved from an existing design and keep the essential feel of it without outright doing just a straight copy. Some of these shows have a very, very loyal following and rightly so—these shows were well loved for a reason. You certainly don't want to alienate those people, and yet, from an artist's point of view, you do want to put a little of yourself into the concepts.

Most of us who grew up with these shows are now adults, a little older, if not wiser, and yet we still retain a fondness for the sometimes outlandish ideas and stories of the 60's and 70s. But now, by improving on a show's ideas and concepts to make sense for today's sophisticated audience, I think we are able to vindicate ourselves and justify our obsessions to our peers. In the case of Galactica, we took the basic storyline from the original series, stripped off all the cheese, and found elements that would resonate in today's world. There are still fantastical elements, to be sure, but at least much of it makes enough sense to suspend disbelief. Who knows? Perhaps in another ten years or so, this version will seem ridiculous and outlandish, too.

CinemaSpy: Did you watch the original UFO growing up?

Eric Chu:
I'll have to admit never having the chance to actually watch the original UFO as a child, but I am very familiar with the worlds of Gerry Anderson and have always been a great fan of puppetry and modelwork of any kind. The challenge in rethinking these designs was to keep the cool factor of the '70s aesthetic without being overtly retro. It's a bit of a balancing act, and one that is hard to get just right.

CinemaSpy: For UFO, it looks as though you chose to update the sensibility of the original designs, as opposed to starting with a completely blank canvas.

Eric Chu: Exactly. If I were to start with a blank canvas, you would only end up alienating your core fanbase. I like to start with the original concept, then push and pull the design so it makes (more) sense scientifically and visually. That isn't to say my designs are scientifically accurate, not by a long shot, but depending on the nature of the project, they at least hopefully give the impression of being plausible.

The Cylon Raider from 'Battlestar Galactica', designed by Eric Chu.CinemaSpy: How do you approach a project design-wise? Where do you begin?

Eric Chu: By crawling into a dark corner and weeping quietly [laughs]. Then once I've gotten myself together and put a cool damp towel on my forehead, I start by scribbling shapes... trying to capture those elements that recall the basic original design without resorting to copying. This is the part where I am the most free and am able to explore any idea with a minimal amount of effort (and maximum amount of eraser crumbs).

CinemaSpy: Do you prefer coming up with entirely original work, or is it more fun to re-imagine stuff from someone else's sandbox?

Eric Chu: Of course it's easier to take an existing design and extrapolate from that. Even if the final design ends up completely different, at least it gives you a starting point from which to begin. However, it is always more satisfying if the design is completely your own. I compare it to the difference between being an editor, and a writer.

CinemaSpy: You're going to have a little fun with some other forthcoming genre properties. Can you give us a hint of what's next to come?

Eric Chu: I'm at an age where many of the shows I grew up with are now making a comeback, either for nostalgic reasons, or to be remade/re-imagined. And I'll just add that remaking and re-imagining are not necessarily bad as long as those in charge have a finger on the pulse of what made that show popular to begin with. If they are just trying to capitalize on a recognized title, then forget it, do your own original property and leave well enough alone.

But to answer your question, clearly the various titles in the Gerry Anderson catalog are prime candidates for making a comeback as well as being a designer's wet dream. Hopefully, you'll be seeing a little more of that. In addition, just keep watching for news of remakes in development or production. If it's design-worthy, you can be sure we'll be considering it for an upcoming Drawing on Imagination feature.

Incidentally, we fully realize that Eric is not the only produced concept designer out there, so if any of you feel an overwhelming need to shame him, or even just light a fire under his ass, feel welcome to submit your own designs. Each time we post a Drawing on Imagination feature — beginning with the next one — we'll announce the following title and a submission date. If you want to show off, here's your chance!

Alien UFO concept drawing by Eric Chu.
Skydiver, including Sky One and I.S.S. ('Eyes') Infiltration Surveillance Satellite. Concept drawing by Eric Chu.
Concept sketch of a 21st Century Moonbase Interceptor by Eric Chu.
Moonbase Interceptors emerge from underground silos in this concept drawing by Eric Chu.


In late May it was announced that The Robert Evans Co. has a first-look deal at Paramount with respect to the classic Gerry Anderson series UFO (1970). Evans' reputation certainly proceeds him; he brought the classics Chinatown and Marathon Man to the big screen. And while he might seem like an unorthodox choice to resurrect Anderson's first live-action television series into a feature film, he apparently seems to grasp its significance both to fans, and to the UK's ITV Global, the current property holder and Evans' partner in the project. "We know the importance of the UFO series brand to ITV Global, and we will work closely with them to build this into a franchise," Evans said.

Here at CinemaSpy we began to wonder what such a big screen version of UFO would look like. How much of it will adhere to the designs of the original and simply update them? Will it translate to our more sophisticated 21st century sensibility and aesthetic, yet still maintain the fidelity of the original? Or will it be completely re-imagined and throw out what's come before?

And that got us to thinking. Maybe we ought to have some fun and come up with a few designs of our own.

Have Your Say: Commentary, debate and opinion
(28 Comments)
Further thougths - UFO design.
Posted by Sproggle on February 6th, 10:25am
1. I should have described the Interceptor as the most iconic SHADO vehicle. The original UFO is, in my opinion, an incomparably good design, with such economy of style that it seems less tied to its decade of origin than any other sci-fi vehicle design I can think of. It looks terrific in the distance-shots in which it occasionally appears in the series, thanks to having less flat proportions than other flying saucers. In my opinion, the old design with tidied up details would be hard to beat.

2. I hope there aren't going to be a lot of 1990s-style black outfits.
Some thoughts on interceptors
Posted by Sproggle on February 6th, 9:21am
1. As I see it, retaining one-shot interceptors makes a lot of sense from a story point of view: artistic restrictions seem to lead to better writing.

2. One-shot also made sense within the story of the original series: the UFOs moved so fast, when in space, that it was one shot or nothing.

3. From an image point of view, the interceptor is probably the most iconic vehicle of the original series. Ironically, perhaps more so now than in 1970, an enormous missile on the front seems a strikingly fresh idea when every other space-ship has death rays.

4. Unless the new interceptors are going to enter the Earth's atmosphere, I'd really rather they were closer to original in terms of not looking aerodynamic enough to fly, preferably with wing cut-outs on all wings so that they can be claimed to be struts, not wings!

5. Whatever the vehicles look like, I hope the (presumed)CGI will be good enough to give vehicles a sense of inertia, which seems strikingly lacking in most CGI - notably the Thunderbirds movie.
take a step back
Posted by Bill Fisher on December 17th, 4:25pm
It's supposed to be 10 years since the last setting and the designs should combine elements of the old but modernised with some improvements.

Big plus for multiple launch capability of the new Moonbase interceptors, but there should be more references back to the old angular design.

Please also include some of the surviving original cast, especially the Moonbase girls in purple wigs, and for God's sake keep Gerry onboard unless you want another turkey.
hopeless
Posted by AM on November 27th, 2:35am
The original designs are still great and the new 'concept' drawings are hopeless, but the are probably first attempts so they might improve. The moonbase in UFO was a utilitarian base designed to get interceptors into position to stop UFO's reaching earth and this concept needs to be built into the design as the big base just makes it a juicy target for UFO's to shoot up with directed energy weapons (lasers) to you!

remakes and reboots don't work unless there is input from the original people who put the original progam together.
Keep original
Posted by alan walsh on September 19th, 12:33pm
Im all for change but generally American producers just dont seem to get the fact that the original concepts are what makes these shows attractive to world wide audiences and usually mess up.I,ve always thought U.F.O. would make a great movie but please heed the advice of fans who after all will pay for a ticket and keep Gerry Anderson and any of the interested original production team in the loop . Please also do a 'Lost In Space' and get surviving actors from the TV series to make cameos.Both producers and actors should get respect for this often overlooked series
Sean1971
Posted by Sean Ellis on September 12th, 6:48pm
I'm excited to read about a movie version, but a bit skeptical, too. The Thunderbirds is the reason for my skepticism, but I don't think there is much to compare between the two original shows, in terms of the storyline/characters. UFO is a much darker concept and certainly a lot scarier than The Thunderbirds ever was. So I doubt it will be made for kids like the Thunderbirds movie.

Designs look great, for the most part. I think the movie should retain the slightly "mod" 60s feel of the show, which was very sleek/sexy for its time, AND quite scary/atmospheric - especially to a kid watching re-runs in the 70s in Australia. At least Robert Evans can remember the 60s!

Along with Land of the Giants, UFO was a favorite of mine growing up. I'd love to see it regain popularity and see a movie version that retains the "feel" of the original. Too much realism might get in the way of the fun, in my opinion. And it should take part at least partly in Britain!
Please don't reboot!!!
Posted by fan1701 on September 1st, 5:44pm
NO MORE REBOOTS!!! How about 40 years later instead!!!. Nope, you don't need our stupid American Hollywood types messing things up. Do it British style! I like the original , but I also like the concepts above. If the movie is worked as a continuation and not a reboot I will be first in line over here in the states to see it. If it is a reboot , I am out . It will be ruined. Hope it is a continuation!!!!
UFO
Posted by drax on July 23rd, 7:36pm
These new designs by Eric Chu SUCK.
make it here
Posted by shado operative on July 21st, 7:18pm
we have the best film studios here in the u.k and it would be great if it could be financed by british resources..the original concept (thanks to the great gerry anderson)was brilliant and bringing to the big screen now will lead to many comparisons..lets hope it works!
ufo
Posted by gerry anderson on July 10th, 12:02pm
we dont need america thank you
Please just leave UFO alone.
Posted by JD on June 29th, 12:26am
We really don't need any more crappy remakes.
Let's move on to something new.
Style and pace?
Posted by Martin Close on June 18th, 10:18pm
Yeah, do watch some of the original episodes - many of the stories are so stupid and cheesy that they are completely UNwatchable. I bought the boxed set and had a devil of a time sitting through some episodes, they were so genuninely awful.

Please update it with modern effects and PLEASE make it dark, darker...darkest. And make it adult and contemporary, too. Sheesh.
Dated?
Posted by John Guerrati on June 14th, 8:09am
I don't think the original designs for U.F.O. look dated(Moblies,S.I.D,Moonbase,Interceptors,Skydiver)& am not living in the past! Yes, update the designs but don't just copy then change bits here & there, I saw a horrible design for Sky 1 that was done for an a attempt to resurrect U.F.O. in the 1990's they'ed welded together the front part of an Interceptor to th back end of Sky 1 it looked awful!Yes, it did remind you of the original but there was no logic to the design. The producers should consult with Mike Trim who worked as a designer on U.F.O. & Gerry Anderson himself.Also I wish they'd drop the 'big movie' idea it's like taking 'The Invaders'& having big U.F.O battles in it every half hour,U.F.O isn't 'Star Wars' or 'Star trek'
People, have I look at U.F.O. on dvd, take notice of the pace & style,there's more to it then what you think than 'Flash Bang'
@ Sean Meaney
Posted by Dixie on June 13th, 11:48am
Re-entry heat? Atmosphere? Looks like you're the one who needs to brush up on science. They're Moonbase interceptors. No atmosphere on the Moon, therefore no re-entry heat.

The experience of the Thunderbirds film notwithstanding, I like the look of these drawings, and would be very interested to see the concept in action.
UFO Movie
Posted by Ian Jacklin on June 13th, 10:53am
Great Site .I have added your link to my blog sie www.shadotv.com
Now head honcho..
Posted by Colonel Foster on June 13th, 4:53am
Re Jeff Leroy...

UFO was a totally british show funded by ITC via Sir Lew Grade. There was no American dosh although a US sale was vital for it's continued existence...
Second in command..or was it third ?
Posted by Colonel Foster on June 13th, 4:48am
When a good friend phoned me to tell me to look at AICN he said it was the best call he'd EVER made...In his life!!All my friends and even my wife know that I REALLY LOVE this series. I always remember being 6 years old and not being able to go into the woods because I thought that the aliens would get me and stick me in a space suit and fill my lungs with a "Bioacrophylic" [?]compound. Needless to say I got over this phobia! Excellent concept,production values and music! Bleak and uncompromising,very British with no real humour,and never giving any information about the Aliens keeping them totally scary must be carried into the movie [IF it was to be made...would much more like to see a new series a'la BSG..A BRILLIANT SERIES]Was Ed Straker [Gary Sinise ?] the guy that Fox Mulder was always looking for ?
comments
Posted by Jeff Leroy on June 12th, 3:35pm
Reguarding the comment posted by Sean, the Interceptors were assembled on the moon and are only used in the vacuum of space. If a UFO enters the atmosphere, Sky 1 takes over. Re: Rob Neal: These big budget British shows needed American finacing, so we Yankees are sort of responisble for their creation and, unfortunately (in the case of UFO) their short lived run.
what???
Posted by Giuseppe on June 12th, 10:49am
The interceptors and Moonbase are quite interesting, also if the unique missile doesn't make any sense at this point. The UFO saucer is absolutely horrible!!!! And so does the Skydiver...
Mr
Posted by Rob Neal on June 12th, 1:24am
I just wish Americans would stop screwing around with British standards. After the utter abortion that was "Thunderbirds - The Movie" they should learn to leave well alone.

Either that, or Brits should take an American classic like "Star Trek", use British actors and wreck that. Oh. Too late, we did.
Living in the past
Posted by Allan DuMaurier on June 11th, 7:14pm
You folks are living in the past - the old designs are hopelessly dated. I like these new designs for the most part...they are much more of today. Since SkyDiver is largely scientifically impossible anyway, at least this new design tries to incorporate a modicum of scientific reality.

And how are these designs dark, exactly? Dark in what way? Just cause the guy worked on Galactica doesn't mean that this stuff is dark, too. You guys have all become Pavlovian trained, apparently.

And BTW, aliens invading Earth are a dark subject matter...so I for one am happy to see the camp thrown out in favor of a more believable approach. And I still see enough in these designs that harkens back inspirationally to the original. These new Interceptors look awesome. Seems like they use a rotating "gun barrel" style to enable chambering more than one missile, if I read the design carefully.
Here We Go Again!
Posted by John Guerrati on June 11th, 2:30pm
Well here we go again,don't think a big screen version will work as it should be a weekly series that should develope season by season.
I would love to see what the crew that worked on 'Battlestar Galactica'could do with U.F.O.
Yes, the designs are interesting but there copying what went before.
Let's have models & CGI together, build the models but 'fly'them by CGI.
I've always loved U.F.O.ever since I saw it 1st time round in B/W in 1971, serious money will have to be spent on it but I can just hear producers now saying 'well can we drop the secret organization with all it's expensive equipment? I've got a better Idea, well have a guy who drives down a long dark country road,a man too long without sleep, I'll think we'll call him David'
Please don't cock it up again!
UFO concept interesting
Posted by Sean Meaney on June 11th, 12:53pm
Still you might want to make a good science version. The interceptors look like they need to enter the atmosphere upside down to take the re-entry heat because the underside is overexposed.
Interesting, but...
Posted by Grant Wray on June 11th, 5:39am
Pat on the back for having a go, but the original UFOs were smaller, therefore higher, allowing them to land in the hidden, wooded areas of, for example, England - a key concept of the original series. These were small scale attacks on individuals, not Independence Day city-busting battle cruisers. The Earth was being used as a farm, and the reason the aliens did not invade en-masse was never explored, adding to the alien mystique; once you understand their aims, you begin to understand the enemy and this lack of understanding was another key concept.

I like the Sky-Diver as a submersible aircraft carrier, but again, SkyDivers are small craft, which entails a larger portion of the ship being plane.

The Interceptor is possibly closest to the original design, but the massive missile was a key plot device - one massive shot at a faster-than-light craft each, so aliens could get through the space defence.

Moonbase was always a fragile structure, and the simplicity and starkness of the original base was more realistic, i.e. you could conceivably build a structure like that on the moon in the 1980s. It was modular, not requiring much foundation, unlike the conceived City-of-London office glass-and-steel complex shown here.

I wait with baited breath to see what might be produced for the mobiles and the moon-buggies.

In summary, a reasonable first attempt, but too far departed from the original concept. I just hope the film doesn't prove to be a clone of Independence Day.
Back to the Drawing Board
Posted by Jeff Leroy on June 10th, 9:54pm
The Interceptor Body looks Buff, but that little missle gotta go. The moonbase looks like a bunch of cluttered junk. The Skydiver design is as dull as anything on the the new Galactica. The glowing fins should be bigger and blurred from spinning on the UFO. Sorry for being so negative.
I quite like these
Posted by Allan DuMaurier on June 10th, 4:33pm
Warren: Not sure what you're complaining about - do you want it to look exactly like what came before? That would be foolish. I for one quite like Eric's take...especially the Interceptors, those look great. I'd like to see more of Sky One, though...can't really get a sense of it from that picture.

But otherwise, this is some nice work indeed. The UFO itself is appealing to me too. It adheres to the traditional saucer shape we would expect, but looks much more organic and interesting.

Nice work!
UFO Artwort
Posted by Warren Golden on June 10th, 1:40pm
You should be do a little more homework on
the styles and design concepts you came up
with for the classic desings of the vehicles and the moonbase for the UFO Movie.

The stuff that you came with for them is
a visual insult to everything the original
artists and designers who had created them,intented them to be.

You need to go back to the drawing board if
you you're going to impress the hard core
fans.
Great art
Posted by Blaine on June 10th, 9:32am
Nice work. These illustrations are great updates. Love how Chu played with the '70s esthetic.
 

Post a Comment

Name:
E-mail:
Title:
Comments:
Security Code:
 
 
Remember me on this computer
Follow Cinema Spy
CinemaSpy on MySpace
CinemaSpy All content on this site copyright © 2007 ~ CinemaSpy Entertainment. All rights reserved.
All movie titles, photos, studio logos & other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
This site may contain rumors and speculation that should be read for entertainment purposes only.
Use of this site signifies the acceptance of our Privacy Policy.
CinemaSpy is hosted by Nexcess.net. Site built by Face3Media & maintained by SplitMango.